Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
cathcart3303

Ombdsman says council must compensate family re inadequate SEN provision

Recommended Posts

Just came across this.

 

 

http://www.lgo.org.uk/news/2012/dec/buckinghamshire-cc-criticised-insufficient-education-boy-special-needs/

 

Buckinghamshire CC criticised over insufficient education for boy with special needs

 

Date Published: 06/12/12

 

Buckinghamshire County Council did not provide enough education for a boy with special needs for over a year finds Local Government Ombudsman, Anne Seex.

 

In her report, issued today, she says: "The boy received no education at all between February and May 2010, and then only a little over five hours a week until April 2011. There is no evidence that the Council ever tried to establish what education would be suitable for him and what he could cope with in his medical condition."

 

She added: "The Council's position at the time seems to have been the Education Act 1996 requires only five hours tuition on medical grounds. This is wrong – as a child's health improves, the hours should normally be increased."

 

Mr and Mrs A have looked after their 15-year-old grandson, Z, since he was seven years old. At 13, he stopped attending school because of anxiety related to autism.

 

Z's GP referred him to the Child and Adolescent Mental Health Service (CAMHS). CAMHS told the Council that Z was autistic and would be unable to cope in a mainstream school. CAMHS offered Z some education at an attached School Room, but it only had capacity to offer 5.5 hours of education per week. He received education there for almost a year. During this period, Mr and Mrs A had to take on the task of caring for him almost full time.

 

Although the Council was aware from March 2010 that it was likely that Z had special educational needs, it did not use its powers to assess these. Nor did it tell Mrs A that she could ask for an assessment. Eventually she found out and requested one immediately. Z was assessed in November 2010 and found to need specialist education, but he did not start at a special school until April 2011.

 

The Ombudsman found maladministration causing injustice because the Council failed to provide Z with suitable education between February 2010 and April 2011 and failed to fulfil its duties under the Education Act 1996.

 

The Ombudsman recommends the Council to:

create a fund equal to the cost of private tuition for the hours of education that Z lost, to be held for him until he is 21 and to be used to provide him with additional tuition, educational opportunities or equipment that an educational psychologist recommends would benefit him, but not for any provision to which he would be entitled as part of his statement of special educational needs, and

apologise to Mr and Mrs A and pay them £2,000 in recognition of the impact its maladministration had on them.

 

On behalf of the Council, the Chief Executive has indicated that it will agree to this remedy.

 

Report ref no 10 010 281

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for posting this.

Too often parents don't know what they can do. Or they just feel that the LA will refuse to do anything [which they often do]. But that does not mean they are right. LAs often act illegally and hope that no-one finds out, and even if they do find out that nothing will be done to punish the LA.

I've had mixed responses from the LGO. They cannot deal with anything that could be dealt with at an Educational Tribunal. But they can look into maladministration. So it is VERY important that parents put things in writing and lodge complaints with the LGO and have that paperwork to submit as their evidence. Too often parents rely on telephone calls and conversations [and that has included me in the past]. If it aint on paper you have no evidence of what was agreed or promised. So get it in writing, even if that means sending the letter yourself stating what you have been told/promised.

 

I've already posted in another forum that we too have been awarded compensation due to the delay in providing residential respite. How many parents on this forum cannot get respite? But you can, if you follow the process and procedure and put it in writing and follow it through. By law, they have to provide for the needs of the child whether that is the LA Inclusion Officers via SEN or whether it is Social Services via Social Care. It is harder to get Social Care into a Statement as it is often argued that it is not an educational need [but it often is - but that is another topic for another day], but if the child has a need and the LA do not provide it, you can involve the LGO.

Too many children receive no education at all whilst they are out of school due to anxiety.

My son received no education for a year. Infact under 2 hours a week for about a year. That did persuade the SEND Panel to Order our parental choice of school. But I wonder if we would have been given compensation if I had lodged a complaint with the LGO about his lack of education.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...