Hi again and thank you for your replies
It has been a very stressful week - we had a school meeting with several people, including the head teacher. The outcome was in our favour with the inclusion manager dropping her demands for assessment very quickly, before the head teacher even made it to the room. Why do I consider this a positive thing? A few reasons: first of all the school based their whole case on personal impressions and had very few facts to present that could justify their description of my daughter's behaviour. Having used clinical terms and having exaggerated them for the sake of making their point they left us little choice but to refuse them - an assessment made taking their views as into account would have been plain wrong.
Mihaela, I do believe my daughter has most of the characteristics of a gifted child and we actually requested that the school consider this as a possibility before recommending an assessment, we even provided them a study about misdiagnosis of gifted children. We were refused but I don't want to go into details because fear I'll turn this post into a rant. I know what you mean by "not merely the same as having a high IQ" , there's a spark, the kid who thinks outside the box and makes valid but unusual connections. I'm not sure where gifted ends and Asperger starts but there seem they do seem to have quite a few traits in common.
In my opinion, a diagnosis overrides any risk, if only because it can be used against them...
If I hang around I might learn more about how I could use a diagnosis for my daughter's benefit, unfortunately so far they seem to have the upper hand. We had a lot of stress and frustration because when we did not agree with all the school's proposals for my daughter (in particular we did not agree with an assessment based on their impressions and we asked for further observation in which concerning behaviour is objectively recorded including what, how often, and if it relates to a particular person or situation, also we did not want the one to one social integration sessions but proposed that they are done as part of the class since we did not see how pulling out a child from the society can help them learn how to be more sociable) they wrote back accusing us that we do not care for our daughter's emotional wellbeing.
To them, it's all about fitting us into neat little boxes, a belief that never properly succeeds
For my daughter this is exactly what I worry about, that they'll fit her into the Asperger box so her unusual opinions, her worries and her unusual but valid contributions (she always tries to change things her way and often has very complex ideas about how things, mostly games, should really be like) will not be considered because she'll be just an Aspie. At the moment she is too young to understand a diagnosis but has already started to notice she's a bit different.
If you suspect you're on the spectrum - as I did, after doing the usual online tests, etc. then you probably are, and I advise you seek a diagnosis too, if only to confirm your suspicions and give peace of mind.
Mihaela, I fear it is a bit late in the day for me, I've given up on the others a few years back and I'm well past caring what they think of me. I can function fairly well in the society if I find appropriate motivation, which I don't often do. I'm aware of the unsettling effect I have on a lot of normal people and I like popping into their midst every now and then to see how quickly they get flustered and awkward, it's my little revenge and I think it's only fair since they too make me uncomfortable most of the time. I'm not being mean by the way, all I have to do is try to have a perfectly normal meaningless conversation.
Alexander, I really feel for you and have to express my outrage at the "experts" that can diagnose but do not help further? Did they at least provide you with some information regarding possible support / treatment if any?