oracle Report post Posted June 8, 2005 (edited) deleted Edited October 30, 2006 by oracle Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Suze Report post Posted June 8, 2005 Interesting......but is that correct ...Lord Adonis?????? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
oracle Report post Posted June 8, 2005 (edited) deleted Edited October 30, 2006 by oracle Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Zemanski Report post Posted June 8, 2005 more on this report on this link http://www.asd-forum.org.uk/forum/index.php?showtopic=2461 zemanski Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
baddad Report post Posted June 8, 2005 "I think what has happened is inclusion, which is a good idea in theory, is being very badly applied in practice. ...And there's the rub... As for the 'over application' of statements - what can you expect if they remain the only possible means of getting needs met (well, at least, defining needs and indicating reponsibility for them - not quite the same thing!) Inclusion has GOT to mean more than 'being there'... The ball's 'included' in a game of football, but it's not the sort of inclusion I'd relish... L&P BD Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
phasmid Report post Posted June 8, 2005 My own son is proof that for some, in his case a diagnosis on the Autistic Spectrum, mainstream education CAN work with little or no 'special provision'. For others, and I have BEEN PART OF THIS, little adjustments CAN make inclusion work. The biggest problem is for the children where more of an effort is needed. Then it boils down to the money - and THAT is where inclusion can go wrong, when the LEAs quibble over support because of 'funding issues'! In many cases the inclusion of the child isn't the issue - it is the lack of funds to support the child that is the issue!! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CarerQuie Report post Posted June 9, 2005 I couldn't agree more.There needs to be real alternatives offered to ensure that childrens' needs are met.If it re-opens the debate,it can't be a bad thing.xx Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites