oracle Report post Posted June 8, 2005 (edited) deleted Edited October 30, 2006 by oracle Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lucas Report post Posted June 8, 2005 How typical that New Labour(not to be confused with the real Labour) thinks attacking the opposition is a valid response to genuine concerns. How strange that the law doesn't state that a child should not be in mainstream school if it harms their own growth. It only says if it contradicts the parent's wishes(and how many parents will be misled about the benefits of mainstreaming over specialist help?) or if it disrupts the learning of other students(which is always attributed to the disability without a shred of objective proof). I'm fuming. I'll post again later. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CarerQuie Report post Posted June 9, 2005 I agree.Education should be appropriate to the childs' needs,not finances.The whole issue makes me so hot under the collar,since it erodes choice.Gggggrrrrrrrrr.xx Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
